From the Access Research Network at www.arn.org/docs/mm/flagellum_all.htm
Molecular Machines Museum
The Bacterial Flagellum
|
The bacterial
flagellum is an example of what Michael Behe describes as an irreducibly
complex system. In his book, Darwin's Black Box, he explains that such
irreducibly complex systems could not have arisen by a gradual
step-by-step Darwinian process.
|
|
Because the bacterial flagellum is necessarily composed of at
least three parts -- a paddle,a rotor, and a motor -- it is irreducibly
complex. Gradual evolution of the flagellum, like the cilium, therefore
faces mammoth hurdles. (p.72)
|
|
Behe summarizes
the structure of the bacterial flagellum in these terms:
Some bacteria
boast a marvelous swimming device, the flagellum, which has no
counterpart in more complex cells. In 1973 it was discovered that some
bacteria swim by rotating their flagella. So the bacterial flagellum
acts as a rotary propellor -- in contrast to the cilium, which acts
more like an oar.
The structure
of a flagellum is quite different from that of a cilium. The flagellum
is a long, hairlike filament embedded in the cell membrane. The
external filament consists of a single type of protein, called "flagellin."
The flagellin filament is the paddle surface that contacts the the
liquid during swimming. At the end of the flagellin filament near the
surface of the cell, there is a bulge in the thickness of the
flagellum. It is here that the filament attaches to the rotor drive.
The attachment material is comprised of something called "hook
protein." The filament of a bacterial flagellum, unlike a cilium,
contains no motor protein; if it is broken off, the filament just
floats stiffly in the water. Therefore the motor that rotates the
filament-propellor must be located somewhere else. Experiments have
demonstrated that it is located at the base of the flagellum, where
electron microscopy shows several ring structures occur. The rotary
nature of the flagellum has clear, unavoidable consequences ... (pp.
70-72)
|
(1261 kb
animation) |
The
consequences Behe refers to are inferred by the nature of its
irreducibly complex components, the discovery of which undermines a
Darwinian explanation of origins. Behe concludes:
In summary,
as biochemists have begun to examine apparently simple structures like
cilia and flagella, they have discovered staggering complexity, with
dozens or even hundreds of precisely tailored parts. It is very likely
that many of the parts we have not considered here are required for
any cilium to function in a cell. As the number of equired parts
increases, the difficulty of gradually putting the system together
skyrockets, and the likelihood of indirect scenarios plummets. Darwin
looks more and more forlorn. New research on the roles of the
auxiliary proteins cannot simplify the irreducibly complex syetem The
intransigence of the problem cannot be alleviated; it will only get
worse. Darwinian theory has given no explanation for the cilium or
flagellum. The overwhelming complexity of the swimming systems push us
to think it may never give an explanation. (p. 73)
|
|
Behe concludes
that such irreducibly complex systems were ultimately the result of
intelligent design. (It should be pointed out that Behe has no
objections to the concept of universal common ancestry. His objections
to evolution are limited to the rejection of the neo-Darwinian mechanism
as a sufficient explanation for the origin of all biological systems.)
|
Copyright © 1998 Michael J. Behe. All rights reserved.
International copyright secured.
File Date: 6.10.98
This data file may be reproduced in its entirety for
non-commercial use.
A return link to the Access Research Network web site would be appreciated.
Page development by Premier Publications
for Access Research Network,
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
|